Is The GSAT A Ponzi Scheme?

GSAT survivors

LET’S FACE It. The Grade Six Achievement Test (GSAT) isn’t just about measuring the academic accomplishments of primary school students. The test is a clear sign of the failure of our educational system to make adequate provisions for all children to access high-quality secondary education.

A ministry of education paper, ‘What is the Grade Six Achievement Test (GSAT)?’, admits that there is a serious problem with ‘the system’: “One challenge faced by the process is the public perception that students are not ‘placed in a preferred school’. Upon examination of the system it becomes clear that the ministry’s ability to place students in their preferred schools is dependent on the number of places available in each school, as well as the number of students selecting that school.”

It was P.J. Patterson who famously defined Jamaican politics as “the fight for scarce benefits and political spoils carried on by hostile tribes which seem to be perpetually at war”. P.J.’s vivid imagery of war could just as easily be applied to our educational system. Last month, approximately 44,000 students took the GSAT. They are battling for 45,324 secondary school places.

Jamaica College

Those ‘objective’ figures suggest that there are more than enough places for all potential secondary school students. No scarce benefits. But there’s a not so subjective subtext that must be taken into account. Certain schools are ‘preferred’ precisely because parents know that some secondary schools are much better equipped than others. And most students will not get into their parents’ preferred school.

Hampton High School

After reading the GSAT paper on the ministry’s website, I called the Student Assessment Unit to get more data. The staff member to whom I spoke was very helpful. I learned that last year the first choice of approximately 19,000 of the 44,000 GSAT candidates was one of just 15 ‘preferred’ schools across the island.

On average, each of these schools can accept only about 500 grade-seven students each year, for a total of 7,500 places. If you can pass GSAT maths, you will quickly figure out that 11,500 disappointed applicants (about 60 per cent) failed to get into these ‘preferred’ schools.

Olympic GSAT training

In a culture of scarce benefits and educational spoils, it’s not just the academically fit who survive. There are other factors that determine performance. In the war for places in ‘good’ schools, the wealthy usually beat the poor. Preparing children to take the GSAT is quite an expensive business. And it is, in fact, a business for the many service providers.

Take, for instance, GoGSAT which outlines payment options on its website: “GoGSAT offers service at a Bronze, Silver and Premium service level”.  Like the Olympics. GoGSAT’s choice of names for the levels of its service cleverly acknowledges the fact that preparing for the GSAT is an extreme ‘sport’. It requires the discipline and endurance of an Ironman Triathlon athlete. Just ask any child (or parent) who has survived the rigorous training programme for the GSAT.

And GoGSAT’s fees are not cheap. At the top end of the scale, students can get personalised online tutorials for J$12,000.00 per month. The generic packages are, of course, cheaper. The rate for the one-month premium package is US$45.00. But it does get more economical the more months you take. For a year, it’s $US149.00. The basic/bronze service is actually free and quite helpful, as I’ve been told.

As early as grade one, students can start preparing for GSAT with the GoGSAT service. It seems as if most students cannot pass the GSAT by simply going to school. Extra lessons are compulsory. And if you can’t afford personalised, silver or premium extra lessons, ‘yu salt’. But why should a test of the achievement of grade six students be so difficult? Shouldn’t ‘achievement’ be the outcome of six years of teaching and learning in primary school? Apparently not.

If students are forced to take ‘extra lessons’ to pass the GSAT, something must be fundamentally wrong with the primary education programme. Or with the Grade Six Achievement Test! The failure of students to ‘achieve’ cannot be dismissed as simply a matter of individual ability, or the lack of it.

Selling illusions

I am indebted to one of my friends for the brilliant insight that the whole GSAT pretence of ‘achievement’ is really a Ponzi scheme. Ponzi schemes sell the illusion that everyone can get rich by ‘investing’ in a dubious enterprise. In the case of the GSAT, the Ministry of Education is selling the illusion that all students who achieve can get into ‘good’ secondary schools.

The people who get in on the Ponzi scheme early in the game do get back their money. But those at the very bottom of the predatory feeding chain don’t stand a chance. Poor people’s children at the lowest levels of the GSAT pyramid have a very hard time collecting any benefits and spoils from the system. Most of them leave school barely literate and completely unprepared for the job market.

Wealthy people who can afford to send their children to expensive prep schools and who can pay for Olympic GSAT training are at the top of the Ponzi scheme. They will certainly get excellent returns on the money they’ve invested. Even if their children don’t get the right scores for admission into ‘good’ schools, these well-connected parents can use their influence to manipulate the system.

It’s time to ‘mash up’ the Ponzi scheme. We should abolish the GSAT and assign places to secondary school purely by lottery. If by chance an Outer City Prep School student draws the bad card of an Inner City High School, that’s that. And if the luck goes the other way, so be it. The playing field would finally be level.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Is The GSAT A Ponzi Scheme?

  1. The idea of a lottery is used in some parts of the world where demand exceeds supply: http://gulfnews.com/news/gulf/uae/education/parents-still-worried-about-lack-of-seats-at-indian-schools-1.973561.

    Another idea that we have tried in Ja before is the shift system. It is less than ideal, but can bump up supply to ease demand. My time in high school during the 1980s-90 were spent in a shift system. It delivered the necessary results. Until qualitative improvements are made, this is one route that ought not to be ignored or dismissed.

    For the naysayers who will demean certain schools based on its location, they need to remember that some preferred schools are located in difficult neighborhoods. The challenge in the medium to long term is to improve the conditions and tools for teaching and learning in all schools.

    It could be useful to consider providing less support to some name brand schools that are “delivering” and who have parents that are in a better position to pay. The diverted funds go to more needy schools. There are many ways to rationalize such a move.

    Lastly, incentives and licensing for teachers may provide an impetus for delivering performance and better outputs at each age/grade cohort. The lifeline of the Ponzi Scheme is the failure, real or deliberate, of leaders within schools and the classrooms.

    The ‘mafia’ posturing of the JTA in this regard also needs to be mashed up. The evidence for this is clear: teachers (indeed, other professionals, and ‘lumpens’ as some would call some of our citizens) leave Jamaica for ‘greener pastures’ and consistently deliver performance and results. This is true for teachers who were part and parcel of the under-performing system on the rock.

    Signed: Jamaican Economic Refugee in the Gulf.

    Apologies for the windiness:(

  2. My crazy suggestion is that the ‘good’ schools that everyone is fighting to get into should be put on the shift system and that the schools currently on the shift system revert to one shift. The principals and parents of children attending the ‘good’ schools will see to it that they continue to perform. Also, I don’t think children should be sent to schools too far from home, requiring them to travel at great expense, and with wear and tear on their bodies. Why are children sent from Montego Bay to Lucea and vice versa, and from Cascade in Hanover to Green Island, when Lucea is closer? How can a student travel from Linstead to Kingston every day perform optimally?

  3. Pingback: Topics of Interest in the Caribbean Blogosphere · Global Voices

  4. Pingback: Topics of Interest in the Caribbean Blogosphere :: Elites TV

  5. I know this has nothing to do with the discussion at hand and may seem trivial, but that picture of Hampton School is of the derelict police station nearby.

  6. Pingback: Trinidad & Tobago: Speaking Out Against Sexual Abuse · Global Voices

  7. Well written ms cooper, and so is the university of the west indies, I am who you referred to as the bottom of the pyramid

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s