KC Old Boys Desire Male Sex

Dr. Patrick Dallas (left) and Dean Nevers at the 2014 dinner

Dr. Patrick Dallas (left) and Dean Nevers at the 2014 KC Old Boys’ Association dinner

I have great respect for the KC old boys who have proudly come out and made their sexual preference absolutely clear. The female sex is not for them.  In 2012 and 2013, the KC Old Boys’ Association tried to make it with women at their annual dinner. They concluded that the experiment had failed. This year, under the leadership of Dr Patrick Dallas, the old boys decided to stick to themselves.

It’s quite understandable. For five or even seven years, at a crucial stage of their sexual development, these KC old boys spent five days, every week for most of the year with their beloved classmates. They fought and made up. They played games on and off the field. And they embraced each other in victory and defeat.

These old boys have become big men, in theory. They have big jobs, big houses, big cars and big debts to prove it. But many of these big men are still just little boys dressed up in adult clothing. They long for the good old days on North Street when being a KC boy promised to make life so easy. It entitled you to an eternity of privilege.

It must be quite difficult for these old boys to adjust and learn to enjoy the company of women – their natural inferiors. It’s not a skill at which they’ve had much practice. Their mothers and sisters don’t count. They’re family. Quite inappropriate for certain forms of exploration! And female teachers don’t make good role models. They lack the right equipment.

Some of these old boys may eventually get married to women. But it now seems as if they don’t really enjoy associating with the female sex. It’s just not to their taste. They certainly don’t want to wine and dine with women. They may occasionally do so on the down-low. But definitely not in public!

DELUSIONAL WOMEN

UnknownI don’t understand why some women are so angry with the KC old boys for publicly admitting that they want to play with themselves at their annual dinner. That’s their choice. They have a right to their sexual preference. Delusional women believe they can channel the sexual desires of men. That’s just straight self-deception. No woman, no matter how hot she thinks she is, can force a man to want her – if he’s all wired up for men.

The unwilling man may, occasionally, go through the motions of pleasing women for a peaceful life. But if his heart is not in it, he’s likely to suffer from penile failure. And though it’s quite possible to fake orgasm, it’s impossible to fake erection. If the man is not psychologically prepared to play ball, not even Viagra can help him. And only God can save him from the vanity of a determined woman who thinks her charms ought to be enough to seduce him.

I much prefer a man to come clean with me. It saves a lot of time and work. Instead of getting all hot and bothered at the pleasurable prospect of making it with this gorgeous man, I can just relax. Nutten nah gwaan. The man is not for me. We can have great conversations and even go out together. But we done know; there will be no going in. Or goings-on!

ignorance-is-not-blissAnd ignorance of the truth is definitely not bliss. Just suppose you’re a woman who’s been invited to the KC old boys’ dinner by one Mr Fortis. You accept, on the assumption that your old boy actually enjoys your company. On the night of the affair, you’re dressed to puss back foot and you know you’re looking good. But after a while, you notice that Fortis not paying yu bad mind.

Female intuition kicks in and it comes to you in a cold flash. Much to your vexation, you realise that you’re actually an unwelcome intrusion. Your old boy’s body may be next to you but his eyes are roving the room, looking for the real objects of his desire: his faithful companions from way back when.

HIGH-SCHOOL BUDDIES

KC-LOGOThe origin of that word ‘companion’ is Latin. ‘Com’ means ‘with’ and ‘panis’ means ‘bread’. So, literally, a companion is someone you eat bread with. And that includes patty and box juice. Your heartical brejrin. No woman can come between a man and his bonafide high-school buddies. Plural. No matter how hard she tries. The brave may fall but never yield!

All the same, several old boys don’t approve of that backward move to exclude women from the annual dinner. These are the real big men who have definitely grown up. They have no intention of leaving their female companions at home while they go off to live in the past with their high-school buddies. After the old boys’ dinner, they’ll want to share bread and bed with their woman.

Kingston College is the ‘brother’ school of St Hugh’s. On November 22, we’ll be having our 115th anniversary banquet. We’re including men. It’s such a pity some KC old boys don’t seem to understand that it’s in their best interest to associate with women, the superior sex. Good sense just might rub off on them. It takes a new kind of old boy to get it.

Advertisements

18 thoughts on “KC Old Boys Desire Male Sex

  1. Your article made me laugh out loud, although I gather it has riled many (men/KC men). I enjoyed the heavy irony. The Patriarchy is happily entrenched, and I am glad you have rattled their cage! (and, presumably, the Lodge isn’t too happy either). It’s all an old colonial throwback anyway.

      • Call this post to you column “satire” or what ever ill- conceived term you wish to use to describe it. Especially coming from an educational professional, some one who is depended upon to mold young minds. This is a disgrace, and in no way amusing. You are essentially branding the alumni of KC homosexual because they attended a male only school. Alumni does after all mean past students and people affiliated to said institution…..Are you and your disgruntled female friends and misguided followers ? How do “YOU” a professor of the English language, equate an alumni function of a “Male” institution to a sexual preference. This column is some extreme gutter crap and is not even worthy of lining the bottom of a dogs cage. This is nothing more than you trying to bully these men because they don’t want you where you don’t belong (sister school my ass) ! Choose something important and informative to do with the privilege of having a column in our national news paper. Trying to brand an entire group of men gay is irresponsible and low. This is at the same level as teenage mocking and name calling…Shame on you old ass. Grow up and get your own life, you are no longer in high school. They didn’t want you then….They don’t want you now….deal with it !!! (like a woman, not as a child).

    • I so AGREE… THAT AS A JOURNALIST MORE RESPONSIBILITY AND RESPECT SHOULD BE HAD FOR THE FUNDAMENTAL HISTORY BEHIND TRADITIONAL SCHOOLING FOR “MALE YOUTH EMPOWERMENT”, NOT DISREGARDING THE FEMALE GROWTH IN ANY WAY.
      … Why does this “JOURNALIST” seem to play childish young girl JEERS at the male only schooling system that has nurtured so many young men who have developed into – MEN OF VALORE. GOOD ENTREPRENEURS , GREAT HUSBANDS, FATHERS AND BROTHERS…
      …We have great relationships with OUR SISTERS FROM ALL-FEMALE SCHOOLS LIKE: Mount Alvernia, Montego-Bay High, WestWood… and other HIGHLY RESPECTED FEMALE EMPOWERMENT EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS….
      Ladies from these school were like sisters who understood how it felt to attend a school without the TRADITIONAL DISTRACTIONS of the OPPOSITE SEX WHILE IN ACTIVE LEARNING (CLASS).
      This develops a CULTURE OF LEARNING, APPRECIATION OF ONE’S SELF WITHIN OUR OWN SEXUAL GROUPS… DEVELOPING A GREAT SENSE OF SEXUAL IDENTIFY AND SELF-EFFICACY.
      I RESPECT MY SISTERS FROM MT. ALVERNIA and MONTEGO-BAY… amongst others….
      It is a great pleasure to meet them in the Professional world, their business approach is very independent and self-aware. They literally ” Think like a man, act like ladies”
      AND IN THIS ECONOMY AND EDUCATIONAL STRUGGLES THAT OUR SYSTEM HAS… ENCOURAGING STRONG SEXUAL CONFIDENCE AND IDENTITY IN THE ACADEMIC WORLD IS OUR GOAL FOR A BALANCED FUTURE WHERE BOTH BOYS AND GIRLS FEEL THAT THEY HAVE AN EQUAL RIGHT TO ACHIEVE THEIR GOALS…ON THEIR TALENTS NOT THEIR GENDER.

      — REGARDING THIS ARTICLE– I AM PERSONALLY OFFENDED BY THE INTENT OF THE WRITER TO HINT AT THE ‘RESPECTED KC BOYS ‘ AS SOME WHAT BEING ON THE : DL (down-low) , and other English Tricks that infer anything other than a DEFENSE OF THE CULTURE ESTABLISHED OVER A CENTURY AGO…
      IF LEFT TO THESE DISTRACTING COMMENTS… HISTORY WOULD NOT BE THE SAME… AND OUR FUTURE WILL DEFINATELY BE IN JEOPARDY.

      — THE LAST TIME I HEARD COMMENTS LIKE THESE – I WAS A YOUNG BOY GOING TO C.C. – BEING JEERED AND MOCKED BY CHILDREN FROM CO-ED SCHOOLS… SAME TEXT, SAME TONE…. SAME LINGUISTIC SKILLS… THAT WAS OVER TEN YEARS AGO…. WHY IS THIS BEING MOTIVATED NOW BY AN ADULT CHARGED WITH EDIFYING THE MASSES OF YOUNG WHO ARE STILL EXPERIENCING THIS SYSTEM NOW..
      THINK ABOUT THE YOUNG GIRLS AND BOYS WHO ARE NOW ATTENDING THESE SCHOOLS AND WHO ASPIRE TO DO SO… like my sons..
      LETS LEARN TO NURTURE UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN ALL SYSTEMS AS APPRECIATING THE DIFFERENCE OF OTHERS IS THE BEGINNING

  2. Carolyn,

    I just got finished reading your pyschobabble or satire as you put it and all I have to say is F@ck you B!tch!

    Now am I being satirical or misogynous? Either way I do not care, have a nice day!

    Fortis for life!

    Jag

  3. more pon plenty, in addition to our sexual proclivities, we nuh have nuh intelligence….bwoy we corner dark….why did I ever go to that school…why!

  4. Gender Studies 101 needed for more advanced analysis of this wonderful example of double entendre alive in genres like Trinidad calypso and many other popular forms of signifying in Black cultures worldwide. At every turn the essay performs its multiple moves of critique, jest, joist. Homosocial clubs in which men enjoy the company of each other are fine but people are free to play with them as happened here.

  5. You really riled them up again! Coming out of the closet seems to be a real threat for a lot of your readers. You advocate for that and make that very clear in this article and in the past. I too prefer the company of an intelligent, successful and full of life male who isn’t looking to go to bed but favors a platonic relationship instead. You are amazing keeping up the controversy and encourage awareness about the deep homophobia that exists in Jamaica. You keep strong too!

  6. Pingback: Giamaica: due gaffe sessiste di personaggi noti causano l’indignazione della rete · Global Voices in Italiano

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s